kermitthefrrog:

why are really good artists following me 

why are really good people following me

did you guys get lost or something

(via areyoutryingtodeduceme)

(Source: motherjones, via recklessmartyr)

(Source: filling-you-with-apathy, via recklessmartyr)

stfuconservatives:

nextyearsgirl:

stfuconservatives:

ethiopienne:

deliciouskaek:

14kgoldnyc:

sanityscraps:

goldenheartedrose:

soultired:

goldenheartedrose:

inflateablefilth:

nothingaboutus-withoutus:

artemispotter:

(snipped)

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

^

(mic drop)

(Source: drunkonstevphen, via recklessmartyr)

marielikestodraw:

antiocial:

hypochondriasis:

2012: the year of the archers ⇢

The Legolas gif SLAYED me. Guuuurl…

(via recklessmartyr)

(Source: hulksmashpunygod, via recklessmartyr)

(Source: yokkomcfly, via recklessmartyr)

"Maybe in my flat I’m the world’s sexiest man because I’m the only guy living in my flat. I’m very flattered. It’s so silly that it just makes me laugh. I see all the faults that I’ve seen for 35 years of my life with myself so I don’t know how else to take it other than to giggle." — Benedict Cumberbatch about being one of the World’s Sexiest Men (via amygloriouspond)

(via jujuproblems)

So I’ve been in the Sherlock tag and I’ve seen some hate against people who write fanfiction. I neither write nor read fanfiction, but let’s look at what our Overlord Sir Arthur Conan Doyle has to say regarding the matter: 

bennyslegs:

davidscustomglasses:

“You may marry him, or murder him, or do anything you like to him.” [To a playwright asking if he may give Sherlock a wife]

So that settles it.

THANKS ARTHUR!

(via jujuproblems)

The awkward moment when Benedict Cumberbatch calls the Sherlockians ‘intelligent’, while Andrew Scott goes for ‘lunatics’… 

evil-sherlock-holmes:

not-a-wish-granting-machine:

alexjeee:

sunshinetinauk:

The actor playing the intellegent character calls us intelligent

The actor playing the psychotic character calls us lunatics

(via jujuproblems)